General

HC TO HEAR ON JAN 24th MHA’S REVIEW PETITION OVER AIRES’S OCI

Published

on

A Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay at Goa comprising of Justice M.S. Karnik and Justice Valmiki Menezes will on January 24th hear the petition filed by Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) seeking a review of the High Court order. The High Court on 25th July last year had directed the MHA to decide within 30 days the application filed by Adv. Aires Rodrigues for an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card.

On 15th May 2023, Adv. Rodrigues obtained a Portuguese Passport in Lisbon and on his return to Goa in the first week of June immediately surrendered his Indian Passport at the Goa Passport Office as was required by law.

After surrendering his Indian passport and obtaining a Surrender Certificate and all the other required documents he applied for his OCI card only to be told by the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO) at Mumbai that the new rule required six months’ residence in Goa before filing an OCI application.

After completing the requisite six months’ residence, Adv. Rodrigues once again on 25th January last year applied for an OCI card and was given an appointment on 5th of March at FRRO Mumbai for verification of his original documents which was successfully completed on that day and paying the requisite processing fee of Rs 15000. Three months later on 6th June Adv. Rodrigues received a one-line email from FRRO Mumbai that his OCI Application has been cancelled.

Aggrieved by the decision of FRRO, Mumbai, Adv. Rodrigues immediately on 20th June moved the High Court. Adv. Rodrigues in his petition submitted that the decision by FRRO Mumbai to cancel his OCI application was arbitrary, illegal, erroneous, unjust and contrary to law. Adv. Rodrigues further submitted that the mere one sentence decision by FRRO Mumbai without giving any reasons violated the principles of natural justice.

The High Court is also hearing a Contempt of Court petition filed by Adv. Rodrigues against the MHA officials for failing to comply with the Court’s order passed on 25th July last year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Exit mobile version